Recently Chicago White Sox announcer Ken Harrelson was
broadcasting a game where Chen-Chang Lee, a Taiwanese pitcher, was pitching for
the Cleveland Indians. Hawk declared it to be an example of
"typical Asian motion. Deception involved!"
Deception can be translated
into different words in Japanese, including ごまかし(gomakashi), まやかし (mayakashi), 欺まん(giman).
The caveat here is that in
baseball deception is a term that actually describes a pitching style, where a
pitcher “hides” the ball when releasing it so that the ball is harder to pick
up for the hitter, thus making it more effective. “Deceptive” has been used to
describe several other MLB pitchers, the one I think of right away is Tony
Cingrani, who twists his body back away from the hitter before releasing to
create an illusion which (apparently) helps his pitching style, as he finished
2013 in top form and is continuing it into 2014. Many Asian pitchers actually
do utilize this Cingrani-like motion of swinging their body away from the
pitcher, but I haven’t really heard a reputation of Asian pitchers doing that
type of motion more than pitchers of other ethnicities. Therefore, I actually
don’t have that much of an issue with Hawk’s use of the term as long as it wasn’t
fueled by racism. He may have been trying to describe the concept that I
outlined here, but it came out as “Asians are deceptive” and generated huge
story lines.
I DO have an issue, however,
with this “Asians are deceptive” stereotype outside of baseball, and I have
heard it before. It does exist out there, not as much as some of the other ones
like “Asians are good at math” or “Asians have slanted eyes,” etc., but it does
exist, which is a problem. The difference between “Asians have slanted eyes,”
which itself is not a great stereotype and I wouldn’t encourage people to perpetuate
that (especially Miley Cyrus) is that I can see where the eyes stereotype comes
from: there is an element of truth, just empirically, that forms the basis of
that stereotype. Asians, objectively, have eyes that seem more to be in an oval
shape and stretched out than eyes on people of different nationalities. That
can be scientifically proven; one can do a sample of 1000 randomly selected
Asian people and compare it to 1000 randomly selected non-Asians and measure the
height and weighth of their eyes and come up with a definitive answer.
That is not true of the “Asians
are deceptive” stereotype. Not only is the “deceptive” measure not
quantifiable, it is purely malicious. There’s nothing redeeming about a “deceptive”
label (as opposed to baseball, where “hiding the baseball well” could be a
compliment for you being a good pitcher). In society, being called deceptive
summons images of concocting schemes, trying to trick others, and fraudulent
activities. The legal definition of “fraud” actually incorporates deception. Lots
of causes of action in the law have to do with deception, including conspiracy,
undue influence, intentional misrepresentation, RICO, etc., etc. And no, you
don’t want to be sued.
The “Asians are deception”
stereotype is probably the worst stereotype of any religious, ethnic, sexual preference, national origin, gender, or any type other type of group to have.
There’s other ones that I can think of involving certain groups that are prone
to violence and crime, and those are pretty bad as well. As bad as those
stereotypes are, and I wish they didn’t exist, there can be empirical evidence
to confirm if those are true or not, and what we can all do to prevent that
from happening, do sociological studies to change the status quo. There is
nothing scientific or beneficial that can be done from “Asians are deceptive”
stereotype, nothing positive that can be gleaned from it, it is just a
devastating stereotype that cannot exist.
Fantasize on,
Robert Yan
No comments:
Post a Comment