Encyclopedia (百科全书, 百科事典, 백과 사전)

Playing chess. Going camping. Going surfing. Taking a road trip. Going to a baseball game. Going to a music concert. Watching TV. Sleeping all weekend. Reading a book. Going to a wedding. I hear a lot of fun things that other do in this wild wacky world of ours, but of all the activities I've heard friends say they are actively doing, I've never heard anyone say they are busy reading the encyclopedia. I suspect this is partly because of the nerdiness associated with reading dictionaries and books that never really went away after grade school where you just don't want to be outed as the nerd who is in the library reading references books for fear of getting your lunch money stolen or just bullied by other kids in your class, but it also could be that encyclopedias seem boring. They don't have a plot like novels do, they don't have a famous actor or actress on the cover marketing their tell-all memoir, they don't prepare you for any particular test like the LSAT or the GRE or the MCATs. There's really no purpose especially in our internet age of reading physical encyclopedias like the Britannica or the World Book Encyclopeda (my go-to encyclopedia). And yet, I must be a special breed because whenver I go to a new library, I always wonder where their encyclopedias are, and often crack open the A section to check out where all the familiar sections of "Alaska," "atoms," and "aardvarks" are and what they say about them (a lot of John Adams, John Quincy Adams, and Samuel Adams action in the first few pages of the A's in the encyclopedia, by the way). I often find that these encyclopedias are in near-mint condition because nobdy has read them; it's like cracking open a new book and the pages still kind of stick together, and pages turn crisply with a little "whoosh" sound. I get enjoyment out of taking an adventure into those pages, but also of the content of the encyclopedias: they've really made an effort (probably to attract any readers they can) to put in more pictures, make the entries more reader-friendly, full of stats, quotations, fun facts, etc., so that it's not pages upon pages of full text. Still....reading an encyclpedia front-to-back is pretty hard work, I like the overviews of states with their capitals, populations, landmarks, famous peoples, famous universities, largest cities, etc., but in between are entries that you can only take so much of like random species of trees, plants, bygone technology, books you've never heard of, old medieval instruments, yet another type of antelope native to Africa. One really is incentivized to skip ahead to something that you're interested in. I've just never ever in my life been interested in fashion and clothing, and it's just a bore sometimes reading about all kinds of shoes, fabrics, styles of the 1930s, etc. It doesn't help that each tome is 800 pages or so, depending on it's a meaty letter like "A" or "M" or even if they have to divide certain letters like C (C-Ch is just one tome). It really doesn't help that encyclopedias are characterized as "reference books," so they're for libary use only and can't be checked out. In this day and age, who's going to steal an encyclopedia? I wonder each time I go to the library and have to put the book back for the next time. Luckily, there are encyclopedias on various topics that CAN be checked out like Space encyclopedia, dog encyclopedia (I really like that one, shows a lot of pictures of dogs and gives the illusion that I have one of those dogs, without actually having one). Yup, reading the encyclopedia is difficult, which is why I give props to an author named AJ Jacobs (I've discussed him before) who took on the monumental project of reading the Encyclopedia Britannica from cover to cover in about 2003-2004. This was before iPhones and just the beginning of the Internet, so people had more uses for encyclopedias back then as a source of knowledge, but still his story inspires me that others have done it before. He didn't even read the read-friendly World Book version, he did the Britannica all-text black and white copy version. Yikes. I honestly don't know if any normal person would do that in today's day and age without some serious monetary incentive now. There's just too much out there. I'm able to go to the library and sit down for a solid hour without checking my phone (and actualy my eyes thank me for letting them read a physical piece of paper instead of a screen, either phone or computer) but it's just too tempting nowadays with a device smarter than any encyclopedia just sitting in your pocket and beeping all the time with new alerts, new information, new communication from friends, there's just too much to do nowadays to read encyclopedias. I wonder how college kids read textbooks, to be honest. But Jacobs's book about reading the encyclopedia is great: he describes trying to use the facts he learned in normal conversation, to no avail; he just sounds kind of weird at parties, he lugs the book around the New York City subway and other inconvenient places to have a 5-pound brick of a book with you at all times, and he discusses important entries he learns about Descartes (liked cross-eyed women), gagaku (Japanese music), all very relatable to an encyclopedia reader: so much human knowledge that is right at our fingertips everyday that we just brush by without a second's thought. Before reading the encyclopedia and getting into trivia (more like general knowledge), I was naive like a babe in the woods. Now after having read the encyclopedia, there's still a world of information I don't know, but I at least know a little about the stuff that I don't know and how much else there is to know. The more you learn, the more you understand how much more there is to learn. In 10 years when all human beings will be programmed with a microchip with all the knowledge in the universe or there's a magic pill that increases your IQ by 100 points, and encyclopedias including digital encyclopedias become obsolete, I'll always look back on those days spent leafing through an encyclopedia and getting endorphin hits each time I learned something new, as "those were the good ol' days."

Caesarean section (剖腹产, 帝王切開, 제왕절개)

What a time to be alive: we have the internet at our fingertips, indoor plumbing, personal showers available at any time, food stocked in neat categories to shop from, almost anything you could ever dream of available upon a click of a button on Amazon, and....Caesarian sections don't require the mother dying. Of all the things you learn about childbirth, one of the many things is how common mothers died during childbirth before modern scientific advances, so to give birth was literally risking your life, and in case of C-sections, it was a death sentence back when it began in the B.C. era: they just cut the mother's stomach, pulled out the baby, and left the mother to die. Pretty disturbing stuff. Nowadays, C-sections are pretty common and come with a very minimal chance of adverse damage and certainly death is not on the table, but it's still a big sacrifice for the mothers as the recovery time is much longer than natural births. And why do they call it Caesarian section? Supposedly Julius Caesar was born from one, but that's not been confirmed, more of an apocrophyl story like Hannibal crossing the Alps with elephants. I was born through Caesarian section, not that I remember it happening. I do remember a little bit about my sister being delivered through C-section, and my mom spent 2 days in teh hospital afterwards. The doctor who performed the c-section also made a mistake and made a small incision into my sister's head, of which she had a scar for the first few years of her life, without causing any brain damage or developmental issues luckily (that we know of). Still, it's not the easiest of processes, and intuitively it seems pretty daunting: There's a human being somewhere inside the mother's stomach, and your job is to cut around the baby without touching the baby with the scalpel. Maybe one of the things that we might entrust AI with in the future, the precise cuts. I can barely figure out where the baby is now when I touch MJ's belly, even though MJ is pointing out where the kicks are coming from. I'm just looking at a sea of belly, no indications of any human life anything (life walking on the surface of the moon). And how do you know if the baby is head first or feet first? if the baby is moving around during the C-section? She's moving around a lot now, what if she gets nervous and starts thrashing around because suddenly a hole has opened up to the world? The answer is probably ultrasound and other scientifcally proven techniques, which is why the doctors get paid the big bucks, I guess. Philosophically, that's a pretty significant moment and metaphor for one's entry into this world: The baby is in a dark place in the mother's belly, kind of existing in this world but not yet, kind of a limbo before wherever we all come from and this world, can't see anything, can't hear anything, can't go anywhere, and then when you're ready to join the world, suddenly.......you go through the portal of your mother's belly into the next world, our world. It's really like the movie The Truman Show, once you go through those doors, you can't go back: the world is a wonderful, delightful place but also a dark, dangerous place...apparently we're starting with generation beta now, not even generation alpha, and this new generation of people are going to be growing up in a world of AI, robots, something we could never have imagined......maybe one day they'll come up with something more advanced than C-sections, like the baby will just be teleported out of the woman's body, or some sort of womb-simulated area that babies grow in instead of the mother's womb.... who knows? Although, childbirth seems like one of the only things left that is not totally explained by science, there's an aspect of magic and creating life out of seemingly nothing is one of the few miracles humans can perform. It doesn't make sense, but it happens, and now the C-section part makes a lot of sense scientifcally, but the numbing the pain part and stitching the scar up, that's also miraculous. Hoping for a great c-section!

Loyalty (忠诚, 忠誠心, 충의)

Loyalty- one of the most cherished values in our society, often preached but executed less, it's the idea of staying true to something or someone, or in the business world, it means keeping a customer for life and not having them go to a competitor. A truly sacred idea for big corporations, as loyalty means a steady cash flow, like signing someone up for a subscription or getting them to apply for a credit card. It's why Costco makes so much money every year and will keep having me back as a customer: loyalty, and the promise of $1.50 hot dog combo and $1.99 pizzas. It's also why MJ books Delta almost every time she flies, avoiding all other airlines if she can help it, and why she just scored one of the best things airline loyalty can get you: business class international flight. Ahh the Holy Grail of travel that I have yet to experience. I imagine it's like getting into the VIP club or being the guest of honor, or how you're treated on your wedding day.....except better. The flight attendants raise a curtain for you as you enter, they write a handwritten note to you wishing you the best of luck, the drinks come often and abundantly, the snacks are healthy and desirable. And the best thing of it all.......the ability to lie down and sleep on the plane over a long transocean flight. One day, if I'm feeling really good about myself and I have all my ducks in a row and my big boy pants on, I might book a flight like that for myself. But for now MJ has gotten it, mostly from her undying loyalty towards Delta Airlines. May they keep rewarding her and keep buying Airbus planes, because Boeing planes are the ones that are having some major issues recently. I consider myself loyal in the ways that really matter, like to family and close friends, but in terms of business I am NOT loyal at all. Whatever is convenient at the time, at the location where I am, is good for me. I will take the cheapest flight or cheapest option that I can get at all times (except Spirit and Frontier) and will always give something new a shot, until it screws me. That's why I tried this new airline called Breeze (from the same people that gave us JetBlue) from Huntsville to L.A. recently, because (you guessed it) it was the cheapest option and the most direct option (Delta only had flights back to Atlanta then to L.A., which for anyone who knows geography, that's going backwards east first and then doing a U-turn and going west. I don't like that; I never doubling back like that and will break loyalty to avoid that. Breeze....is totally fine, happy to report. Everything operated as expected, I was offered an exorbitantly expensive $4 for a Spindrift sparking water that I could get at home for a unit price about $0.25, so I refused and just got regular water, which was still $0 (at some point I feel like this might change, and at some point I feel like airlines will start charging tip for their flight attendants, I just have a feeling) but otherwise I was not charged a fee for my "laptop bag" that I brought with me, no surprise charges, the flight took off on time and landed on time, and I even accessed Wifi for $8 to summon some trivia study materials while on the plane. My thing is, I'm not the biggest fan of unpredictability, but taking a chance on something also brings me unexpected joy sometimes that I somehow got a good deal out of it, maybe the gambler's mentality of trying something new and adventuring out into the unknown. When I stop on a long road trip to get gas, I don't really care if it's a Mobile, Chevron, Speedway, 76, Shell, Sheetz, whatever is pumping out unleaded fuel, I will get, preferably the cheapest option available. I am definitely not the type of person corporate executives are targeting when they send out loyalty plans and subscription models; I am very very fickle about what I buy (if anything) and have walked out of line at a Subway before when the line was longer than I wanted it to be (one person). This kind of "whatever works" approach has probably saved me a lot of money over the years and given me a lot of shall we say "different" experiences as a customer (I was once stuck in Durham, NC for the whole night waiting for a Greyhound bus that never came, and I had to book a 5AM flight instead), and it has also made me not ever get close to anything MJ can do with her loyalty points on airlines, I've always been her guest at airline lounges, the riffraff from "Group 6" boarding zone who somehow is with the Silver Medallion Gold Star status that MJ has. I don't need to be loyal to Delta; I just need to be loyal to MJ.

Baby store (婴儿用品店)

MJ and I went to a few baby stores to check out some baby items today, and it made me question the whole baby product business. I've learned this lesson before, from commercialization of higher education (college tuition, textbooks, etc.) to weddings (every wedding venue has a huge upcharge once they know you're doing a wedding and not just a regular party) to Christmas to Valentine's Day to pretty much everything that costs money in the U.S.: it's a pyramid scheme. Are these baby companies just capitalizing off parents' anxiety and worry about not being prepared for the baby when the big day arrives? I haven't gone through it yet and I may eat crow about it, but my guess is yes. Take "Carter's" child store for example: a strip mall store we went to that sells mostly children's clothing. Why does it sell mostly children's cloth, including children's toys, children's Halloween costumes, cute hats, shoes, all that? Probably because that's where the most margin is, and it's stuff you don't really need. Open secret about babies: They get bigger really quickly! So they can sell clothes from 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, etc. unlike adults where MJ has worn the same Nike shirt at home for all 9 years of our relationship. I'm pretty much the same, I wear my clothes until the lettering falls off, and wear socks until there are multiple holes everywhere. And for some reason every pair of shorts I have eventually pops a hole in the crotch. It's not me, I swear! I think my washing machine/ dryer has a disklike for all clothning and wears them down significantly faster. Anyway, I'm a minimalist and never wanted that many fancy clothing, and luckily MJ is not obsessed. But then there's all the other "must-have" items: crib, bassinett, stroller, car seat, baby bottles, baby bouncer, a nursing pillow, nursing chair, breast pump, etc. etc. These are just the basics, but there are literally thousands of types of just strollers. One store we went to had a $15 consultant fee just to let them show us their strollers, as if choosing one of a thousand strollers is a life-changing decision in the life of a baby synonomous with choosing their first car to drive with. The baby doesn't care! It's probably the only time the baby won't care, by the way, in teh first few years of life, then I imagine they will start getting picky about their food, their clothes, their toys, everything, but for now they don't care! I feel like I probably grew up in a bare minimum, change diapers, go to bed, sleep, wake up, eat, and then go back to bed. What happened to babies born in the wild like Tarzan or Mowgli raised by wolves with no modern amenities and no need for a crib or anything? They seemed to have turned out already, maybe even the better for it. What's with Target stacking up huge aisles of baby products just to make a profit off of us naive first-time parents? In a society where everything is for sale, even having babies is commercialized, maybe even more so because it's finally another way for a hardened, habitual shoppers who only go to Costco (MJ and I grabbed a pizza and hot dog at Costco today for $3.50, it was glorious) to add more to our budget and change our spending habits (for the better for the big companies, for the worse for us) and bleed the common man of some of our hard-earned money. They probably figure parents likely have money, or else they wouldn't have had a kid (parent planning) which is probably not true for all parents, but also, talk about opportunistic vultures. I feel like baby should just be another human being, we just need food, we need shelter (room to sleep in), a bed, poop, and wear clothes. That's how I live my life, why can't she be like me? The whole post-partum doula thing is even worse. There's a whole cottage industry of people thriving off of taking care of baby after the mom is compromised either by natural birth or by c-section and can't operate normally for a few weeks/months, wearing adult diaper and lying in bed while the baby is at its most vulnerable, the first days of life. So these post-partum nannies come in and help the families, which seems like a noble profession and a good job to have but it's because commercialized with various companies advertising their services at high rates and "pimping out" (no other way to say it) these doulas to come help the families, and the work week is 5-week days, so you pay for "5 weeks" but that's actually just 25 days of actual work, you need to pay 6 weeks for a month's work! Welcome to Parenthood! More complaints to come but I can see already why the financial burden for a baby is so high for families, and this is before the baby is even here!

Pickleball (匹克球, ピックルボール, 피클볼)

I don't think pickleball is very popular in the Asian countries yet, but it's exploded here in the US. i've been on record as saying pickeball is just tennis for lazy people, or just a passing fad; maybe I've given it an unfair shake. Just tonight I wandered around on a summer evening....and there was a tennis court, full of pickleball players. No one playing tennis. All pickleball players seemingly having fun, and it hit me: pickleball is a genius invention, and I can't believe I didn't think of it sooner. Tennis is such a frustrating sport, full of chances for errors: you hit it too hard, it goes out. You hit it too flat, it hits the net. you hit it too soft, the other player gets an easy shot. Points end early and often, and there's a HUGE learning curve, especially for serving: I played years and years of tennis and still don't have a reliable serve where you have to hit it overhead into a box diagonal to you, and you have to spin it in because the box is kind of small: very hard to get into it, kind of like violin or computer programming. Pickleball is easy and the complexity that drives tennis away turns into simplicity that draws people into pickleball. That and the camaraderie: pickleball is always played in a group of 4 from what I've seen, and the physical intimacy of the partners does matter. Tennis has doubles too but it's all just one shot kill, the average rally is like 2 shots. Pickleball you get a wider racket, the ball doesn't go as far, people get to hit the ball more. That's really all there is to it: it's more fun. Leave tennis to the professionals on TV like Jan Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz. Pickleball is for the masses. It's probably one of the sports that has the best shot of becoming an Olympic sport; lacrosse and a bunch of other sports try but don't have the mass support. Probably one of the best things to come out of the pandemic. Pickleball is like something I probably would have have thought of when I was younger, like when I worked as a camp counselor during summers after college; a time of creativity and inspiration, where I thought everything was possible and my ideas would be accepted. Before I went to law school and got a MAJOR reality check of what life is really like, most people don't appreciate your ideas, going against the grain is frowned upon, people will only listen to you if you have power or they have some incentive to listen to you (money, fame, attractiveness being some of the most common). Maybe in another lifetime or the 2nd half of this life I'll come up with something genius, that no one else has thought of, that revolutionized how people do things, something as earth-shattering as changing tennis courts everywhere into pickleball courts. Until then, they're just fanciful whims in my head.

Nursery rhymes (童谣, 童謡, 동요)

When MJ and I have a child, that child is going to have some high expectations lumped onto her (fairly or unfairly, I'm not trying to be a Tiger Dad but there are just some things we hope to have our child do) such as: learn different languages, and be raised (at least) bilingual. If the baby can handle it, hopefully trilingual: MJ has expressed her desire to have both sets of grandparents be able to speak to the child (mine in Chinese, and hers in Korean). That's going to be a tall task, though, as I don't speak very good Korean (MJ has remarked that my Korean is VERY basic... and MJ's Chinese is in the early stages, let's say). I imagine the baby will pick up English quickly enough, but in America there are some traditional ways to start baby off in the language, with nursery rhymes being a key component: quick little poems that rhyme to teach children basic words. There are some common ones I didn't even consider nursery rhymes but I realize now, duh...Twinkle, twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are." It might be tough also because MJ wasn't raised in this country, and missed the class on nursery rhymes, like Jeopardy had a question about "Old McDonald" the other day, and she thought it had to do with McDonald's the fast food restaurant!!! Luckily this generation of Americans also isn't intimately familiar with nursery rhymes, as The Floor contestants evidence regularly, and even Jeopardy contestants have some trouble with the harder ones like "Little Boy Blue (fell asleep in a haystack)", Old Mother Hubbard (gave the dog a bone), Jack be Nimble (Jack be quick, Jack jump over the candlestick). Yea, now then that I think about it, these nursery rhymes are a little difficult, and the vocabulary isn't the most basic level like A-apple, B-boy level. Candlestick? Nimble? Haystack? I guess these were old English rhymes that people thought would be ubiquitous in a person's life, now they've been phased out due to technology. Nowadays the easier ways to get kids attention are like the Baby Shark song with consistent patterns of letters like doo-doo-doo-doo and members of the family. Easy to remember, and actually the tune was started by a Korean company called pinkfong! Other languages have nursery rhymes too! 風婆婆 and something called "風來啦" all are good nursery rhymes to teach kids the language early and get all the Chinese tones correctly, which I feel like is more important than English when it comes to hashing all 4 different ways to say seemingly the same word like "bu" or "bo." The one thing I look forward to doing is reading to baby, but also learning Korean with baby! I'm ready for some Korean nursery rhymes and finding out how little kids learn Korean! I've already learned some children's games and children's songs through this educational program called "Squid Game" on Netflix, time to learn some fun ditties! Realistically, the baby would probably tire of speaking in different languages to different parents, so we would have to manage expectations, but hopefully my gene of loving to learn will pass through! I always just liked learning more words, adding more to my brain, feeling more empowered. Probably the same impulse that bodybuilders have to get more swole, I have the same impulse to always be learning, exercising the brain. I'm actually really jealous of babies, having a fresh brain to absorb everything and not littered with all the junk I've put into it over the years. Babies probably have the "morning brain" you get after a full night's sleep and brain ready to absorb new information, except babies have it all the time, just absorbing everything like a sponge. I have that brain for "simple information" like words and their counterparts in other languages and maybe the faces of certain people, but not so much complex thoughts like deep legal theory or physics concepts unfortunately. Nursery rhymes work though!

The Floor 地板, 床, 바닥)

MJ is big about what kind of floor we have in our home, and it's a pretty simple philosophy: NO CARPET! Allergies is a major reason, but another one is what goes into carpets that people don't see: sure the long fur and deep colors can cover up some of the nastiness that goes into the carpet that doesn't get swept up, but there can just e stuff hiding in there. At least with the vinyl floors we have now, I (and more importantly, MJ) can see what is on the surface and clean it up as necessary, and vacuuming is easier. Count me in as a hard floor guy. It's tough living on the floor of society nowadays. I went to Jack in the Box the other day and ordered the No. 1 on the menu with the combo because I was dying of thirst and (similar to MJ) I've been craving fries recently......and suddenly it turned out to be $16.00! That's a far cry from the $1.50 hot dog and soda combo at Costco! I thought of what it must be like for the people still making just $15.00 minimum wage per hour (it may have increased since then, but still) and what a financial hit just getting a greasy burger at a low-rated fast food chain must be (sorry Jack in the Box, but that's the consensus review among my generation of people). Unfortunately, that's the economic reality of people at the bottom: wages are stagnant and don't go up very often, but inflation hits you hard, so your wages actually give you lower purchasing power. For every major superstar celebrity or Youtuber you see on TV who get all the attention, there are probably thousands of people living on the floor who are just struggling to get by, and I get reminded of that every time I go to places like....Jack in the Box. It kind of reminds me too to not fall in the trap a lot of people do of getting too used to luxury: once you start flying business class instead of coach, you never want to go back. Once you start paying for the express lane on the highway, you never want to go back. Once you let your kids have cell phones, they never want to go back to reading or studying. It's very nice to be living at or the near the ceiling, but you need to have started at the floor to know what a blessing it is to be living at the ceiling, and to stay sharp and hungry lest one day you're back living on the floor (one of my worst fears really). Oh and turns out my order was probably entered in wrong at Jack in the Box.... even they're not that usurious to chareg $16.00 for their basic combo, except maybe at the airport, where it's really high crimes and misdemeanours for price gouging.... NEVER EAT AT THE AIRPORT. I've gotten into the game show "The Floor" recently with Rob Lowe. I binged the first season straight in about a day while visiting said airport and Jack in the Box, was so excited about it I showed MJ and my sister.....and they both were underwhelmed. I don't get it. Lots of trivia in a short amount of time except it's mostly pictures you identify instead of text clues like Jeopardy, and it's a duel format where 2 contestants battle in one of the contestant's chosen "categories" like Halloween costumes, State Capitols, Olympic Sports, Fruits, etc. I found that I have a lot of gaps in at least my visual identification of certain categories, like I just did not register seeing a daffodil, or a picture of Bad Bunny (Is THAT what Bad Bunny looks like?) Also tests reaction time, retrieving the answer from the back crevices of your mind quickly and blurting it out loud, and depth of knowledge. Like I just DON'T KNOW that many country singers, so would I survive a whole minute on the clock of identifying country singers by their faces? Garth Brooks, Keith Urban, Kacey Musgraves, Tim McGraw.... Luke Bryan and Kane Brown stumped me. Good study tool for trivia lovers, even if some of the categories are really easy, like naming all 50 states based on their location on a map. Rob Lowe is......LITERALLY one of the most expressive game show hosts out there, he doesn't have to do much except wince and react to contestant's missed questions.....he's great at it.

EB-5 Fraud (Eb-5欺诈, EB-5詐欺, Eb-5 사기)

Recently, I started helping my relatives in China with an EB-5 matter that's becoming increasingly common nowadays: EB-5 fraud, where an EB-5 company takes money from Chinese clients for an investment like building a bridge or a building and promising a return plus getting a green card to the U.S. years in the future......and then never delivers the funds, or embezzles the funds, claiming the investment just didn't pan out and the money's now gone, conveniently. There are so many scams out there now like Bitcoin scams, mysterious messages saying that I owe money for running a toll that I never used, etc., but the EB-5 scam is kind of a classic one of getting investors to invest with promises of high returns but not delivering, much like the pyramid schemes and Ponzi schemes of the early 20th century or even closer to the Bernie Madoff schemes in the 2000s. Unfortunately, it's common because Chinese investors don't know the law here in America, they make the investment without fully appreciating the risk, figuring it's worth it to take the risk if they get a green card in the end. (I guess the green card for permanent residence in America, as much as current residents complain about it here, is still worth something to America, often a LOT of money like $500,000 per green card). Plus there's a language barrier, a culture barrier, the EB5 company holds all the cards because they receive the money and the investors don't know what legal channels to pursue, etc. Oh and then there's the matter of a lot of Chinese people coming into great wealth in the last 20 years or so, and they gotta put their money somewhere, so they want to come to America! For any future investors: don't be like my relatives, not consulting an attorney before investing, but once there are signs of trouble, finally consulting attorneys to see what can be done. Know all the risks BEFORE you put the money in. My relatives also have the mistaken assumption that all attorneys in America can handle pretty much everything (I guess attorneys have this reputation in America too as most don't understand what attorneys do). Just like you wouldn't go to a dermatologist or psychiatrist to handle your open heart surgery, you can't just go to any attorney for any legal problem. There are specialties, especially differences between litigation and transactional, criminal law and civil law, Intellectual property versus family law, etc. It's not a one-size-fits-all profession, but alas that's one of the downsides of going to law school and becoming a lawyer: all friends and family now just assume you know every law there is (lawyers don't know every single law out there, we learn how to interpret the law and argue about the law to help the client), how to handle any type of legal situation, what to do if they end up in jail and need to be bailed out. Through questions from distant relatives I've learned quite a lot about trademark law and immigration cases and now EB-5 fraud, which I'm happy to volunteer to do, but I know for sure I'm not providing the best legal representation out there. I'm just a normal dude with "Esq" at the end of his title and a State of California Bar number.

Bodies of Water (水体, 水域, 수역)

There are too many bodies of water in the world. Too many gulfs, too many straits, too many rivers, too many estuaries, too many seas, too many channels, too many sluices, too many oxbow lakes. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate all the physical bodies of water, they're the life blood of the earth (although some would argue their rising sea levels is causing land to disappear and bad for the overall health of the world) but there are too many NAMES of bodies of water that we need to know about, like every body of water has to have a name. There's recently the big controversy about the Gulf of Mexico being called the Gulf of America, a silly debate really about names and labels and symbolism of American strength.....that gulf, whatever you want to call it, is important because it has large chunks of America and Mexico bordering it, and is a huge body of water flowing into the Caribbean Sea with all those islands. The Great Lakes are named the great lakes for a season: they're so big and take up so much of the mass of North America that you have to get to know them, which states they border, etc. But do we really need to know GREEN BAY is part of Lake Michigan, that tiny sliver of Lake Michigan bordering Wisconsin (I know, coming from someone who grew up in Illinois this seems biased at best). Do we really need another name when it's all connected? I probably have tons of logical fallacies in this argument, and honestly geography is one of my favorite categories, but how many people in the world really need to know about Baffin Bay, or McMurdo Sound, or the Weddell Sea? Those are places that a tiny sliver of people working in extremely cold places only need to know, and even they proably get confused where the Ross Sea starts and the McMurdo Sound begins. Some of these bodies of water seem like downright plant-flagging, like hey I did something great or I claimed this land, I need my name on it, like the Magellan Strait, "world-renowned" for connecting the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific Ocean in southern Chile near Tierra del Fuego? Really, is it that important? It's not as great as the Panama Canal cutting through 2 big continents, you could just sail a little further south of Chile and go around that way if you really wanted to get through. (I'm probably just upset the other day I got Strait of Magellan mixed up with the other strait named for a famous explorer, the Cook Strait in New Zealand). I think some of this obscure geography facts does make non-trivia people roll their eyes, and the geographic stuff is easy and fun to write questinos about, but really difficult to find a use for in America on questions about the Gulf of Aqaba (you really going the Sinai Peninsula after you visit Egypt?) or the shrinking Sea of Azov. Sure, a sea is shrinking and might shrivel up. But that seems like a problem half a mile away. Other trivia categories seem.... a little more practical, or at least interesting. Every movie, book, song, or TV show tells some sort of story that is dynamic, with characters and plot and it changes, so people are interested about what happened and the conflict that people face. History is very useful about what the earth has gone through. Cars, corporations, fashion, food.......all every day uses, even if a little "corporatized" making it sound like an ad every time they promote a Blizzard from Dairy Queen or McFlurry from McDonald's. Anatomy and medicines/diseases are probably the most useful trivia of the bunch. But weird obscure places in the world very few people ever go to or care about? Hard sell, which is why nature documentaries have to put animals in them otherwise people tune out.

Tires ( 轮胎, タイヤ, 타이어)

Today I got all 4 tires on my Honda Accord replaced because....it was time. 8 years, 80,000 miles, those tires had seen a lot, and maybe on some level I could feel it. A lot of things in life happen gradually without us noticing, and it just gradually makes small changes incrementally, like gaslighting or the famous boiling frog story of the temperature of boiling water gradually increasing while the frog is in it leading to negative consequences as eventually the frog will be boiled alive. I couldn't really tell if anything was seriously wrong with the tires. Eventually, I felt like my tires would grind down to such a level that they wouldn't be road worthy, or they would just burst while driving, so I decided to make a change. After getting it done, the driving felt......smoother. The car still reacted to bumps and potholes, of course, but on flat land it felt a little smoother, and on turns there wasn't as much friction. The wheels feel nice, like I'm wearing a new T-shirt that doesn't have the sweat stains or marks from various previous incidents. A lot of facets are like this, incremental changes: shoes getting worn down every time you walk around in them so that the tread wears off and you don't get the traction (this is the most analogous to tires), dust piles up in the home until it becomes a thick layer coating the whole area, battery life on Apple iPhone goes down gradually as Apple tries to get you to buy the newest model by making their older phones run out of battery faster, and the human body obviously: gradually our bodies get older and everything is less tight, we get flabby. Oh and also I have a knot in my back that formed gradually because of bad posture and not sitting up straight until one day it just became a strain no my whole body; now I feel it all the time and can't get out of it. These are all tiny little things that aren't noticeable like bananas turning ripe, but eventually they become glaring problems. Does the boiling frog metaphor work the other way though? Do certain things get incrementally better without us noticing, until one day we've just become unwittingly a huge success? Not as much, because as human beings we're quick to celebrate the happy things in our life that make us feel good, like checking my bank account (hey there's more there now this Friday! Yay!) or winning sports games, there are various scores and numbers to tell us how we are doing, and we pay attention to those like a hawk, never letting them just go on unchecked, so very few things "suprise" us after long periods of neglect. (Hey suddenly I'm married and have 3 kids!) We usually notice all the good things, except maybe the rewards points I get on credit cards and Chipotle purchases. The other day I realized I got had more than a THOUSAND Chipotle points! That must get me something good, right? Nope, 1600 points is needed for an entree, the simplest burrito. Darn. Trivia, I'm hoping, works this way, where one day I just wake up really good not realizing I've mastered all the major things to know in trivia (no one knows everything of course, it's an infinite field of knowledge). Maybe some karma points, like donating blood/platelets eventually builds up to something and we don't even know it? An immunity to chronic diseases later in life? A "free blood transfusion card" for when us blood donors actually need blood to use it when we need it? Not sure that's how it works. No, I think the positive inverse of the boiling frog analogy is probably what I mentioned, the intangible love and trust and goodwill that you "bank" time and time again without noticing you're doing so, until one day you realize you're in a loving relationship with parents, wife, child, or friend. Suddenly I've been friends with someone for 30+ years! I know everything about them. That sort of thing, you know like important stuff.

LaCrosse (长曲棍球, 라크로스, ラクロス)

Growing up, I never had a chance to play lacrosse, and I'm starting to realize that was a missed opportunity to do a sport that is pretty fun, like playing hockey but you don't have to skate, playing soccer but you don't have to dribble with your feet (I'm starting to realize feet were my problem with sports; I was pretty good with hand-eye and upper parts of the body, just the inability to jump high, run fast, or kick hard was a big problem). In suburban Illinois, it was a mix of tennis- (I recently realized pickleball has a Michael Jordan of the sport named Ben Johns? In tennis Alcaraz v. Sinner is the new Agassi v. Sampras, Nadal v. Federer, list all other comparisons, etc.) In the winter, it was swimming and driving us to a nearby bowling alley for...bowling. Oh and the indoor sport we did most similar to lacrosse was.....handball. I actually have some fond memories of handball and it's actually similar to lacrosse, just without sticks, and less facemasks. That's the one thing I don't appreciate about sports requiring helmets or other headgear: I wore glasses back then, would never have enjoyed putting glasses back on my nose and all the awkwardness. That's probably why I liked swimming back then: I was finally able o ditch my crutch and have equal opportunity in the pool. Lacrosse was just too hoighty-toighty, East coast for Chicago I guess. When MJ and I recently visited the National LaCrosse Hall of Fame, we learned that a.) Lacrosse is not an Olympic sport, but it was way back in the early 1900s, their international association is trying to lobby them back in, and I sympathize having been part of different campaigns to get dodgeball in as an Olympic sport, and b.) All of the national champions are schools in one part of the nation, mainly the Northeast, like Maryland Terrapins, Duke Blue Devils, Cornell Big Red, Virginia Cavaliers. Oh and it's coming back as an Olympic medal sport in 2028! Figures that the sport that started as an indigenous sport and since then became the national sport of Canada would be concentrated in the Northeast. Goes to show some games and sports are just cultural and limited to certain regions. Those of us who grew up in the Midwest missed out, I fear. We did also learn about Native American tribes that played the sport, including Iroquois nation of Onandanga, Seneca, Mohawk, Oneida, and....Cayuga. That's some trivia right there. More trivia: The American painter who depicted many Native Americans was George Catlin, in the 1800s. That's the great thing about having a child (or children) if ambitious: it's like giving yourself a second chance at sports, to live vicariously through your children, and let them figure out what sports or activities they want to do, let them have a shot at being really good at something. Whether it's dodgeball, pickleball, lacrosse, swimming, whatever, a child gets to start from scratch and is like an open book: the pages haven't even been written yet. (That's from a Natasha Bedingfield song). I wish for any child of mine to be able to get that chance from a young age and get as dedicated as possible, and I imagine a child of mine will want to be competitive and chase their dreams. Here I am, 38 years old, and still chasing my dreams, wishing for that one chance to be something great.

Malcolm-Jamal Warner

I was saddened yesterday by news of the death of Malcolm Jamal-Warner, the actor who played the role of Theo Huxtible in the now-forgotten comedy series "The Cosby Show." Why is it forgotten? Not because it wasn't a good show, it told a great story about a family of African Americans living in New York City growing up in an upper-class neighborhood, they were my TV family growing up: I always thought of myself as Theo, having to deal with various sisters but also the pressure of eventually becoming the man of the house. No, the Cosby Show was canceled because the gross acts of one man, the lead actor on the show, who abused his power as the star in gross ways, negating all the good work by everybody else done on the show, and now nobody will ever talk about the Cosby Show: Jeopardy won't have clues about it, it doesn't come up in any "top sitcoms in history" lists, it's like the show never happened, expunged from history. Except it will always live on as a part of me, like the first episode where Theo pierces his ear and might have an infection but doesn't want his dad to find out, like the episode Theo was given a harsh lesson by his parents about paying for rent and having to pay for everything in the real world. Another reason why I don't go in the ocean anymore at the beach (other than because I watched Jaws and who knows what's in there): people drown, like what happened to Malcolm Jamal-Warner: the official cause of death being asphyxia and drowning due to strong currents. It's always a little fuzzy with celebrities because the cause of death often gets tangled up with drugs or some sort of underlying causes (heart attacks that were drug-induced, etc, also see the weird circusmstances around the death of Gene Hackman) but this one seems to be a clear case of drowning by waves. Drowning cases in the U.S. are higher than I expect, with 4000 deaths per year, and a slight uptick recently since 2020-2022 (more people tired of being bottled indoors due to Covid and taking more risks at the beach?) The lifeguards are much more limited than at a swimming pool ( I always wondered why there are 3 lifeguards covering a small area of a swimming pool but just one lifeguard for what seems like a mile of beach), you're really on your own. I'm a pretty good swimmer from my youthful days on the swim team, but I will readily admit I would be no match for strong waves, and most people have an inflated sense of how good of a swimmer they are, which is the problem. They die because they think they can make it back; sad really. And said for Warner, who inexplicably was 54 years old (tempus fugit, aka time flies, I only remember him as the forever 13-year-old boy from the Cosby Show), which sounds old when I think about it as my 20-year-old self) but now that I'm getting older........that really doesn't sound too far away. He was still a young man! Sad. Every summer there is seemingly one headline that just comes out of nowhere to gain traction and because the trend of the summer. last year it was the Hawk-Tua Girl (who has since disappeared off the grid) and this year it's the Coldplay concert couple who were caught having an affair. Not sure if it's just because summer has slow news days, people are ready for anything to break up the monotony, the salacious headlines get more attention, or what, but it's everywhere since last Friday: people at baseball stadiums around the country are mocking the couple by hiding when they get shown on camera, doing spoofs. Here I am just wondering how it might become Jeopardy relevant and become a clue at some point (give the controversy a name! That would make it more likley to show up on Jeopardy). But then again, we're all delighting in the breakup of 2 families in the most public way possible, so there's that.

Musings on Reddit

I'm a big fan of Reddit, I own the stock (RDDT), I think there are genuinely good people who use Reddit and try to provide good advice, and I've gained a lot of good knowledge on the site from crowdsourced material and AMA sessions (Ask Me Anything) that you can tell is the actual person claiming to be who they are. That said......I think Reddit, much like the rest of the internet, can cause a lot of anxiety if you're on it too long. The same old adage of "anything is excess can be dangerous," and the Internet is rife with excess. MJ was a very diligent user of Reddit for her IVF process, and credit to her she really read every single comment, compared notes with different subreddits, found stories that aligned with our case. The IVF reddit, though, can be a breeding ground for trauma, horror stories, and jealousy.... MJ reported that eventually people who went on there to post about their successful IVF cycles received retaliation and backlash for "oversharing" or seeming too proud of themselves for having been successful while others were still having difficulties. It's such a difficult balance to have sympathy for those who are going through setbacks and frustration, but what's wrong with sharing successful IVF stories if they are genuinely trying to help other people going through the same process? Something beautiful and productive eventually devolved into doing harm. Similary with preparing for children, reddit can really cause anxiety with everyone posting special cases. I do wonder if the people who go on Reddit are the ones with extreme conditions or feel the need to share all the time; those who are just trying to help just stay calm and don't say anything. My suspicions were confirmed today at a "parent council" (one of MJ's friends had a pool party where tons of kids the same age came along with their parents) and multiple parents told me, "don't be alarmed by what you read on the Internet.") A lot of what's on the Internet is for pushing products or for commercial gain, as newborn parents are the most vulnerable to doing whatever they can to get this baby thing right (I'm already getting a lot of videos popping up in my feed about birthing classes and birthing products) and what better way to sell something than to appeal to fear and making people feel inadequate, or unprepared? If only there were a magic pill or get-out-of-jail free card that we can get for taking care of everything in the childcaring process. I often wonder also who the average user is and why they're so confident and assured in their beliefs; I often am not sure about anything I say and second-guess myself all the time, being convinced by something somebody else said I hadn't thought about. I notice this pretty often actually; I find in American culture people tend to say things with confidence a lot more even in cases where they shouldn't have had that much confidence. It could also just be the anonymity of the Internet and not having to face any social consequences; I also post on Reddit sometimes and I feel the freedom to post my strongest opinions (without need to post evidence) in a faceless forum where people are not reading my facial expressions or seeing who I am that they can remember me for next time. What IS good for reddit? The Jeopardy reddit, or reddit for TV shows. So much analysis and articles I never thought about, angles to explore, other shows to watch. The Jeopardy reddit is pretty chock full of former contestants (you can tell from the highlighted part in their bio when they appeared on the show) and future contestants talking about the show. Good resource for sure for all things Jeopardy, and not too serious as to render any trauma or drama like the IVF reddit.

Jaws (颌, 顎, 입 부분)

I recently got to watch "Jaws" at a live orchestral play-along of the classic summer blockbuster, first played in 1975 and still a classic today, its 50th Anniversary. It's just a summer classic: first released in the summer, the movie's set in the summer, right before July 4th weekend, it's in a summer resort locale of Amityville (somewhere near New York City, one of those beach cities), the main antagonist is a shark that only would cause problems in the summer (don't see many people going in the water during the icy winter), and the beaches evoke images of summer and long, endless days spent out at the beach under the sun. It's still got star power: the orchestral hall I attended, which normally does NOT seat that many people for a normal Friday night or Saturday night showing of a Mendelsohn or Bach concert, was pretty packed to the "gills" on a Sunday afternoon showing of Jaws. It reminded me of why I go to movies: the screen is big, the lights are dimmed, the audio is pumped up, you really get into teh movie, and also......for better or worse, the rest of the audience reacts to the movie, which can be great for a comedy when the laughter is timed correctly, horrible if someone is just not cognizant of others and yells out spoilers, coughs, sneezes, etc. Something about going to the theater, though, still retains its value and is a different experience than watching on my computer sitting no my couch: I can stop watching or pause the movie at any point, I can be on my phone, I can fall asleep, I can barely pay attention, I can be donating blood (!) but that's actually kind of the point now: theaters actually FORCE you to concentrate on the movie and get off your phone (the ushers made sure to remind those who still had them out) and thousands of people actually collectively did something together and shared in the collective community of the event, something that doesn't happen as often in a world where we're separted by our phones all the time. It doesn't hurt that Jaws was, is a good movie. Not MJ's cup of tea (although we did watch all 3 seasons of Squid Game together), with people being eaten by a shark and losing limbs and blood in the water (I've never liked diving into ocean water with all the salt and big waves, it just gives me even more reason not to now), but the tension is pretty high; the villian doesn't even show up in its full form (we finally get a glimpse of him) in the 2nd half of the movie (AFTER the intermission!) and of course the iconic line: "You're gonna need a bigger boat." People clapped at that utterance as well as Quint's speech about losing men to sharks during WWII. Luckily, Jaws isn't really a horror movie; the shark attacks are not scary necessarily, and watching it with orchestra allows you to know exactly when Jaws is going to reappear, soon after the conductor picks up the baton again and starts up the strings playing the daa-dum music again presaging certain doom. If and when civilizations devolve into machines and simulations, I'll remember experiences like watching Jaws with a room full of people and orchestra playing the score as one of the luxuries of real life, the epitome of the human experience. Nothing like sitting in an air-conditioned room watching a summer blockbuster shark movie during the dead of summer. Watching Jaws is somewhat similar to watching the newest Jeopardy superchamp no Jeopardy, Scott Riccardi, tear up the competition on Jeopardy. I recently learned that I have made it into the Jeopardy contestant pool (it's a dream come true) so I could be called anytime within the next 2 years to be on Jeopardy, so of course I've ramped up studying even more and gotten involved even more, and being a competitive person naturally but even more so with Jeopardy, compared myself to Scott. I'm not quite at his level yet, but I hope to be when I'm ready to be on the show. It's a little discouraging to find out that Scott is only 26, in a different generation than I am, and still getting all these questions right, but then I remember I'm a pandemic baby of Jeopardy, only really started watching every day in September 2020 soon after finishing less intellectually challenging shows like Tiger King and other Netflix shows. But boy would I be upset if I ran into a champion like Scott if I got onto Jeopardy.... he encourages me to study harder.

Are you there god? It's Me, Bobby

On the weekend that the blockbuster movie "Superman" (by James Gunn) came out that promises to be one of the "hit movies of the summer," I watched a less heralded movie called "Are You there god, it's me, Margaret, based on the novel Judy Blume. Sometimes the movie business gets so caught up in the marketing and the pushing of blockbuster films that the really good movies get lost in the shuffle, the ones that everyone really should be seeing that reflect the cultural zeitgeist and just make us feel good about ourselves but also have cultural relevancy and a deeply compelling story, back to feeling like we did when we were younger. In 2022 I remember that movie being "CODA," the story about a young girl being the daughter of deaf adults, a movie I had no problem sitting through and hanging onto every scene, and laughing the whole way through. "Are You There God" is very much the same and it definitely earned its 99% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, just the soundtrack itself is full of bangers and Jeopardy worthy material like Dusty Springfield "Son of a preacher Man," The Guess Who's "These Eyes," and "Signed Sealed Delivered" by Stevie Wonder. So why didn't I hear about this movie in 2023 when it first came out? The release date serves as a clue: April 28, 2023, just weeks before the summer movie phenomenon known as "Barbenheimer," when both Barbie and Oppenheimer were released within weeks of each other and everyone had to go see one or the other, leaving no time or attention for movies like "Are You There God." I really appreciate a movie about girls growing up, because as a boy I watched plenty of boys movies like Sandlot, Mighty Ducks movies, Free Willy, etc., that focused on the adolescence and growing-up on boys, so much so I never considered how girls grew up, like it's a totally different world as in Men are from Mars, Girls are from Venus. It's a whole different world of worrying about bra sizes, having crushes on boys, secret societies, making friendships as a girl, what to wear at all times.......all topics brilliantly depicted by the movie and through Margaret's life, portrayed by Abby Ryder Fortson. I specifically remember when I also asked my own conception of "God" similar questions, like helping me through a test, winning my next game of chess, hoping I would get into my dream school. I sympathesized with Abby who struggles with her religious identity of being in a family with a Christian mom and Jewish dad; I never really got into religion at all but had seen so many depictions of God through media and heard good reviews about him, yet I had no relationship with God or any way to contact God, so I came up with my own inner God to guide me. To this day, I still have inner thoughts to a very non-specific "God" (not really thinking about a white guy with a huge beard), more of an amorphous being that transcends the world we live in, maybe more of like karma or some other cosmic force, to just consider blowing the winds of fortune my way, which they already have in many ways throughout my life, but maybe just a little more with some upcoming events in my life. I only wish I could be as pure of thougth as Margaret in the movie wishing for selfless things for her family and for other people, than for myself. Watch the movie! Currently streaming on Peacock, where Poker Face Season 2 is also streaming, and 300+ old episodes of the Weakest Link! I swear the trivia shows of America all use some of the same material, a lot of the questions I see on Jeopardy come up in various forms on other shows like Weakest Link too.

Golf Cart (高尔夫球车, ゴルフカート, 골프 카트)

Using a golf cart on a hot summer day has to be one of the most indulging experiences in the world. Instead of carrying your own clubs around for 18 holes, up and down, under the sun, over rivers, uphill and downhill, through the fairways and onto the greens, you just use modern technology to get to to the next hole. It's one of the reasons I and others view golf as one of the more high-brow sports out there: guys walking around swinging pieces of steel or lumber and trying to get a little ball into a hole hundreds of yards away. Definitely not a sport I grew up with, and I remember getting bored in gym class when we went outside to swing golf clubs for half an hour. Where was the running? The jumping? The touching of a ball and making it go far? Golf seemed like it was just a mechanical process, not much resistance or dynamic play to it: just aiming your ball to a certain area. The other great thing about a golf cart is you can keep water and other essentials in the cart within arm's reach, which is great for cold drinks, snacks, and.......yes, I realize many golf courses are doing this now, alcoholic drinks that they have a nice lady come with a mobile bar to sell you. Now in my late-30s, though, I definitely realize the appeal of golf, at least the golf cart/ fancy golf course part of it. I'm still not very much into staying in one place and hitting balls, but getting out on the golf course and enjoying the great outdoors? That is something I can get behind. Americans reserve some of the best land for this recreational sport of golf for some reason, with tiny creeks and trimmed lawns just waiting for you to walk through. This weekend, my grade school buddies enjoyed a whole weekedn of golf (and even Mario Golf the N64 video game). They enjoyed it a little more than I did because they actually knew what they were doing having practiced their shots plenty of times before, but the few times I could actually hit the ball generally in the direction I wanted to? Great feeling walking with my chest puffed out feeling like a hundred bucks. It's weird, golf: such a sense of accomplishment for just the simple action of swinging a club on a ball that's not even moving....baseball players might say this is like hitting a sitting duck; a lot of moving parts go into hitting the perfect golf shot: your legs have to be in the right position, you have to swing your hips, rotate your arms, follow through, keep your head level, keep your eyes on the ball: I kept reminding myself all these things before every shot but even then I still messed something up at least half the time: it's one thing to know what to do, another thing to actually do it. In some ways, golf is kind of like trivia: it takes a LOT a LOT of reps before getting good at golf and being ready to get to the best golf courses: my buddy took me to the open-to-the-public clubhouse of Whistling Straits, one of the fancier courses in all of Wisconsin, home to a few PGA championship events over the years. There's no way I'm ever playing there at anywhere near a competent level, unless I work on it for years and years. Yes I could pay the $700 to get on a wait list or something to play, but I wouldn't be able to do well, wouldn't understand the intricacies of the game well enough to even enjoy the game, and I'd look pretty foolish for even trying. Getting good at trivia takes a LOT of reps. It's not hard to take practice and shoot a few shots, but really getting good at both golf and trivia? A lot of dedication is involved, but like the Malcolm Gladwell concept of 10,000 hours, if you dedicate yourself for 10,000 hours to the game, you will get good at it, because you just drill yourself with enough questions to know what to expect, condition yourself to know the answers, and to answer quickly. 5 years ago when I first started watching Jeopardy, I would NOT have been good at the game, and getting onto the stage would have made me look silly, and I wouldn't even know how much I still needed to know to get good. Now, almost 5 years later, I do realize how much I know and how far I've come, but it's like a neverending tunnel: the more I know, the more I understand how much I DON'T know.

Sequels (续集, 続編, 속편)

I recently caved after seeing this movie pop up on Amazon Prime and suggested for me and trending and every other buzzword to get me to click and watch it: I finally watched "Gladiator 2," starting Pedro Pascal and Denzel Washington and Connie Nielsen.... but no Russell Crowe, who wasn't even asked by director Ridley Scott to appear in the movie because Maximus died in the first movie. Sounds like Crowe and Scott didn't like each other, is what it sounds like. No dream sequence where Maximus wife's sees him in a dream? Flashback scenes? Hallucinations? Nothing? It's just one of the many things that was off about Gladiator 2, with the main thing being that it just wasn't Gladiator the original movie, the live shots of the colosseum, fights with live animals, the whole epic quality of it was just missing, despite them admittedly putting some really cool graphics into it and even having a naval battle in the Colosseum. That seems to be a general rend in Hollywood: the sequel of hit shows just doesn't capture the magic like the original does, and no amount of marketing, cliffhangers, new cast members, etc. to capitalize on the previous movie's success can mask how difficult it is to like the movie, and give a sinking feeling that they've cheapened the original. Gladiator 2 was OK, it didn't completely sink the ship, but The Matrix: Resurrections definitely brought down the reputation of the whole series, and it was a triple stumper on Jeopardy with no less than Ken Jennings dunking on it by sympathizing with the contestants, "I didn't see it neither." When I'm on a plane and have so many options to watch, (and really it's the same at home now too with the amount of movies available through streaming platforms) I will always get lured to the original, more flashy movie with new concepts and new characters than the sequel. Even Disney has the same problem: I heard Frozen 2: (no subtitle) came out but really didn't go to see it, and same with Moana 2: (also no subtitle). Project Hail Mary, Andy Weir's project after the Martian, kind of feels like a sequel to the Martian, and..... has a lot of great concepts, but I do think it suffers a little because it's too close to the original, it's the same plot of man gets stuck in space by himself, has to find a way home. I think it'll be bought as a script (the book pretty much reads like a film script already) and they'll definitely want to stay away from calling it "The Martian 2" or anything suggesting a sequel. My dislike of sequels, however, doesn't extend to TV shows for some reason: sometimes the first season is the best season out of the 5, but oftentimes it takes the showrunners a couple seasons to get into the characters, form a bond, and season 3 becomes the best season. Why do human beings dislike sequels? For me, at least, it's the constant need for new stiumulus, the hedonic treadmill of needing new things all the time. As much as I loved going to new art museums and new sports stadiums and visiting new cities or checking out new restaurants, the second and third times, inevitably, lose a little luster. They could still be great experiences because the first time was so epic that there's plenty of room down from the top, but you never really get back to experiencing that for the first time, it's like your body adjusts to it and it's never as excited or stiumulated anymore. I wonder if it's the same with parents who have their second children, that the first time was so unique and so special (and traumatizing) and so unforgettable that the second kid just becomes old hat, with slightly newer challenges but the same baselilne needs. I bet the moms, though, feel every bit of that pain and turmoil giving birth. It can't be easy going through childbirth again! I wonder if the body just shuts down all memories of the problems of childbirth so that the mother will want to procreate again, and that's how the human race continues and life finds a way. That may actually be similar to how sequels get made, the studios block out all the negative experiences and knowledge that the second movie will not measure up to the first, but makes it anyway for the sake of art, the franchise, and the lifeblood of everything that gets made: Money.

Three-child policy (三孩政策)

Ever since I was a child, I was aware of the "One Child Policy" in China because my parents were subject to penalties if they went over one child, and I was that one child. Talk about pressure! Recently though, due to declining fertility rates around the world and especially in China, they changed their policy to encouraging prospecive parents to have kids, upping the number not from one to two but jumping up to "three is best." (There was a brief period in parts of China were they had a "two-child policy" where any parents who had more than 2 children would be subject to penalty, but that's now been scrapped for three kids. It's a lesson in not trusting the government to stay committed to one policy, as the government needs to adjust its policies based on how the world changes, but the Chinese government especially looks foolish now for limiting parents to one child for such a long time. Basically, if you go for a radical policy that goes against incentive structures and human behavior, you might regret it later: all those only children in my generation lived rather lonely lifestyles and in my opinion made us less likely to have children because we experienced what it was like to be lonely as a kid without a big family and the joys of having a big family, so we don't need it. (I do have a sister but our relationship is not a typical sibling relationship due to the age gap). There's also wacky stuff about the one-child policy: what if you have twins or more? (probably a provision in there that said you could keep the babies if there were unexpected multiples). And a big problem in America is unexpected pregancies: Parents with a kid already: You get drunk one night, make some bad decisions, and boom you have a second child: do you get punished for that? The financial punishment and socially the second kid could not be put into the national system, so they didn't technically exist and wouldn't get benefits, education, etc. Pretty intense, and you have to wonder how many children were aborted due to those looming punishments. The ironic thing is, now that the one-child policy has been lifted and the "three is best" philopsophy has been adopted and encouraged when it's convenient for the government now to have more children (it's blatantly just a social welfare thing and nothing individually beneficial for the parents like say, mothers get healthier if they have more children or anything), it's the financial incentives that are keeping people from having children, this time not imposed by the government by worldwide it's the looming cost of having another mouth of feed but also daycare, education, owning a home, gas prices, just everything: I can't be the only one who frets about inflation doubling prices every 10 years or so, meanwhile what the jobs be like in 10 years? Will there even be jobs? People are ALREADY worried about not having enough money to have kids now while there are jobs, what will it be like when there aren't jobs? Maybe every generation has the same worry and it all works out 30 years later that having kids was a good decision and worth it financially ("it all worked out in the end") but during my parents' generation there was still optimism about the future, computers weren't even generally accessible yet, you could think of more jobs coming, growth industries, various fields in science and technologies needing people to help guide them into the new century. (Ironically, the time when people were optimisic was when China clamped down on their birth rates, while now people are pessimistic but the government wants them to have more kids. Going against the grain). And yes, three kids seems too ambitious. I polled my friends who have had kids: There are not really any "savings" to be had after the first child, it's not like you can recycle everything from the first kid and give it to the 2nd kid and 3rd kid and so on. Each kid has their own costs, own lessons (you don't get a 2-for-1 or 3-for-1 deal in most places), they have to pay for each seat they take up in the airplane, you have to buy a bigger car, each has their own dance lesson classes, tennis classes, etc. (Unless you do what I plan to do is give my kid a book and tell them to read, everything costs money). So many scams and things you don't need (the American economy and probably the Chinese economy thrives on people paying for these!) are lumped on you when you have a kid whereas I can avoid it now: daycare, going to Disneyland, getting games and phones for the kids (if one kid at school has it, all the kids want it), food, the coolest clothes and shoes, baseball games, it's like opening up a Pandora's box of temptations and guilt trips for parents thinking they might not be doing their best for the kids. And parents are supposed to be saving for college during all this time of supporting the kids, who are negative inputs into the household income? Another big thing I thought of just writing this: healthcare, maybe the biggest scam of them all. Need a family plan! It's all pretty daunting. I know China wants everyone to think "three is best," but most sane people and their bank accounts think, "zero is best, but we'll settle for one if you really need one." One of my friends with 2 kids said he'd gladly have a third kid.......if he could afford it. And then there's the lingering fear of what our world will be like in just 10 short years. I just watched Terminator from start to finish for the first time: we as humans can take all the precautions and preventative measures against rogue AI that we want, and do a good job 99% of the time (given the current political climate and what world leaders are doing, doubt the number will be as high as 99%), but all it takes is that one rogue machine that's a super-intelligent being higher than all of us to go out of control and then you get Arnold Schwarzanegger marking us all for elimination. The machines will think for human babies "Zero is best."

Bar Tab (바 탭, バータブ)

The world is fascinated by the lives and spending habits of Gen Z, and the New York Times just ran an article this past weekend about Gen Z closing out their bar tabs after each drink they order even if they might order more, giving themselves more flexiility to leave whenever they want (and possibly curbing their spending) but leaving the bartenders and bar ownership miffed because they have to process the credit card more than once, give a receipt, have them sign, whereas before there was this concept of "running up the bar tab" where you just left the tab open all night until you were ready to leave. This doesn't happent that often, but I am totally on Gen Z's side on this one; the idea of the bar tab was almost as bad as tipping as a way to force customers to spend money; it's a deliberate ploy by the bar to make customers spend more money because if the tab is "open" it's super easy to order something else, so you keep spending without knowing how much you actually owe. Ever notice how the bartenders are super happy when you leave a tab open but super bummed when you close out? Always asking you if you want to start a tab, but reluctant to have you close it out? It's these little games they play (like at Jiffy Lube telling you to change your filters once every 2 years) and it's effective. It's part of the reason I don't go to bars, that and I never liked alcohol, I don't socialize with people anymore, and I just never fit in at a bar, it's always loud and people tend to be rude and......drunk. I once went to a bar, accidentally knocked over a drink a lady had been holding in the tight confines of a bar, and another dude approached me later "suggesting" that I buy this lady another drink. I didn't think I was really at fault, but I did it anyway and just left the bar life for good. And it's not like I was trying to "meet people" at these bars. Bars are like Disneyland: they mark everything up in price just because they feel like you "want to be there," there's often a cover charge just to get in the place to get the privilege of spending more money there, and it's often hot and crowded, you wait in lines to get the bartender's attention to have them serve you a drink for $15 that you could have made for $5 at home. Seriously, I have a solution for bars and the Gen Z bar tab problem: don't have bars anymore. I don't think anything in society is lost by not going to bars anymore, maybe people would go to church more or more places beneficial to society, there'd be less drinking and driving home from the bar, people migth actually stay home on Friday nights and read books. The bar tab story was one of those stories I kept yelling in my head at whoever wrote this, "OF COURSE GEN Z is doing this!" Talk about a generation who has no respect for prior generations' customs, but also has no money! My sister (on the cusp of Millenial and Gen Z) complained to me about how she has no money and spends her whole paycheck and had to finance the purchase of a mattress out of her own wallet and also pay gym fees and can't afford a trainer anymore........but then of course at lunch she goes ahead and orders the "pink lady" vegan drink with kombucha that's $7.99 on top of the lunch that I was treating her to. They really don't want to spend more money than they have to because THEY'RE ALREADY BUDGETING IT ON STUFF THEY DON'T NEED. And also they have no attention span, so why would you expect them to stick around a bar for more than one drink? They probably spend their time in the bar on their phones looking for the next place to go to. There are actually genuine victims of this phenomenon that I feel bad for like libraries, certain schools (not necessarily elite colleges), hospitals that need nurse, but it's not bars. It's like feeling bad for taxi drivers before Uber and Lyft came into the picture: they're just mad someone else came along to take their ludicrously profitable industry that rewarded price gauging and ripping off unsuspecting customers. Speaking of Taxi drivers being replaced by rideshares, I feel like most of our industries are like the taxi business in 2009 right before Uber took off, or Kodak in 1999 right before the digital camera, or The Pony Express before the US mail service: it's the dying days of some jobs, we just don't know it yet, except unlike previous labor revolutions where one service went out of business and replaced, it's going to be whole plethora of industries, maybe more than half of all jobs getting replaced within a few year span. Actors....do we need actors anymore? Teachers... do we need teachers anymore? Do we need politicans anymore? (We definitely want to get rid of politicans if we can). Do we need lawyers anymore? (Gulp). Everything I'm hearing is that AI is here to stay, unlike a lot of jobs. So don't worry bar owners, you're not alone: everyone else is feeling the pain of new attitudes and new technology.

Slip and fall (滑倒, 滑って落ちる, 미끄러져 넘어지다)

"Slip and fall" is another term of art that only English and specifically America has usage for, it doesn't really make sense in Asian languages because they don't have that giant segment of the law, so the translatino would just be "slipped down" without anyone in Asia knowing that we're talking about an area of the law. In America you say "slip and fall" and I think most people would know you're talking about accidents that might require lawsuits; it's a litigious society and lawyers rely on it being that way. Today at Costco of all places I was witness to a typical Slip and fall accident, when someone loses their footing due to dangerous conditions on the floor resulting in injury. This type of accident is so common in the world and contributes to so much of the workload for personal injury attorneys that there's a special segment of the law for it, called "slip and falls." I remember my first semester of law school torts class dedicated a large part of the curriculum to negligence, the theory of the law that covers slip and falls and who is at fault, what kind of causation can be drawn (direct cause and proximate cause), the reasonable man standard, eggshell plaintiffs, and strict liability statutes. I caught myself thinking too much like a lawyer and didn't like that I could only think about law school while someone got injured, but there was nothing else I could do; it was a big store with lots of people, and the Costco staff attended to the situation. Law school also teaches future lawyers, unfortunately, not to help if you're not sure you can provide adequate support because you would then take on a "duty" as a care provider and that opens you up to liability if someone else goes wrong. A bystander who does nothing, conversely, assumes no duty, just a moral kick in the butt for not doing anything. I wasn't paying close attention to the fall, but the Costco patron apparently got bumped by another customer (happens often on weekends at Costco just due to the sheer mass of people who crowd into their warehoues looking for deals and free samples), slipped on something (she didn't look like she was wearing the most comfortable shoes), and the fell down on her back, possibly the back of her head on the pavement. She stayed down for the entire time after that and didn't get until an ambulance called. She also didn't speak much English; her husband spoke Chinese to her when she was struggling on the ground. Just a surreal situation; could have happened to my parents, they definitely go to Costco too. A more enterprising personal injury attorney might have introduced myself to the husband and todl them about what remedy they might seek from a huge corporation like Costco, but I find that sort of business unsavory, and I hope never to have to stoop to that level; I try to make as much money as I can now at my job to make sure I don't have to do work I'm not good at (there are so many jobs I wouldn't be good at, like mechanic, computer engineering, doctor) but also also jobs that I might be good at but involve being shameless and openly making people spend money they really didn't have to, like what salespeople do or personal injury attorneys do (sue everyone!) Having people spend money on things they don't need is what keeps the American economy booming like it has, but doesn't mean I have to conribute to it unless I have to, I arguably eceive paychecks from law firms that do that by proximity already, so I don't want to double-dip on the money-grabbing. I do wonder sometimes, though, about personal injury cases and they day-to-day grind of dealing with multiple cases at a time, explaining to clients why their case won't be as lucrative as they thought, hearing about people's injuries and misfortunes. There are a LOT of lawsuits out there people don't care about, don't know about, it's the underbelly of society that doesn't show up in the news or on true crime podcasts or Netflix special like the Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp case (high profile cases like the P-Diddy case are what people tune in for, but there are millions of regular cases for that one special case). I used to go to the Los Angeles Superior Court civil division and there are whole halls of courtrooms filled with people suing for civil cases, then more floors upstairs with criminal cases, etc. I know it's useless turning a blind eye to these and digging my head in the sand like an ostrich, but I feel a profound level of sadness at all the time and energy going into some of these disputes when the world is just passing by. I guess me being a risk averse peron who's never been in a physical confrontation nor a legal confrontation, nor even really a verbal confrontation (although I have gotten angry at some folks on the sidewalk, and MJ has shown some darkness against bad actors) I just let it go and move on with my life, never even getting anywhere close to being involved in a lawsuit. I just wish there was a better way to resolve disputes rather than go through a long drawn out process full of legal fees, paperwork, talking to lawyers, negotiating, getting health checks (in the case of personal injury, getting a doctor to check you injuries is the first thing to happen), going to court, I personally would just try to avoid all of that if I possibly could, even if it meant gettig less money or paying a little more money. For the couple today at Costco, they might be able to pursue some sort of legal remedy depending on the customer's injuries, but going against a big corporation that has experience handling slip and fall cases would be tough, with an army of attorneys working for them and drowning you in a storm of paperwork. I just hope she gets better and avoided a concussion, and left with just a headache.

7 sisters (7 姐妹, 7人の姉妹, 7자매

Wellesley, Smith, Radcliffe, Vassar, Bernard, Mount Holyoke, and Bryn Mawr. Those are the proverbial "Seven Sisters" colleges established to rival the Ivy League and their "male counterparts. I've never been to any of these schools, but in law school a couple of classmates had gone to Bernard, and another one to Vassar- liberal arts colleges, and the alumna from there seemed just very Northeast Liberal arts schooley.... I get the feeling I would not have fit in one of those schools, not just Seven Sisters schools because they are female-only, but just the vibe, the culture, the elitism, the fancy nature of the schools, the intellectualism; I don't consider myself really an intellectual, I identify more with the masses than the high classes, I don't aspire to be a CEO, I'm just trying to make it in this world. University of Illinois was right for me. But that doesn't stop me from wanting to visit all these schools! I don't have cravings for many things (MJ has a LOT of cravings for different food right now) but my craving is to get out in the world and experience new things, anything but sitting at my desk all day and doing the same mundane thing over and over again, staring at a screen. And I crave being on new campuses; every time I go somewhere knew I try to check out the local university, because at least I know there will be some fancy buildings, and I'll feel like I'm in college again, even though I'm not. The best thing about walking through college campuses: it's free to everyone, despite being exorbitantly expensive for some who actually attend the school. Like casinos, like a positive externality for the rest of the world, funded by the students' tuition, except unlike casinos the students who graduate also get something out of it too, so thanks all the students and former students of every college I've ever went to! Sometimes college campuses are the best places to just walk around. MJ and I (don't ask me why!) visited the campus of Old Domininion University, the location of which I would not have known before visiting Old Dominion University (just like the other day on Jeopardy I didn't know where University of Vermont was located- it's Burlington, the largest city) and Voila, they have an excellent art museum with a Barbie/ dolls exhibit, and a centerpiece every art musuem needs: a Dale Chihuly glass piece. Worth whatever price they paid for it, that's what draws me to art museums. (Old Dominion is in Norfolk, VA, by the way, and not the only major university there, next to Norfolk State). Maia, Electra, Taygeta, Celaeno, Alcyone, Sterope, and Merope. Those are the Seven Sisters aka the Pleiades, a star cluster located in teh constellation Taurus, and a cluster named after Greek mythology, daughters of Atlas (yup, the guy who had to hold up the world on his back). I've never seen the Seven Sisters, never yearned to find them, never looked at a stargazers' map, never took too big of an interest in astronomy until learning trivia facts.......but now I find myself devouring books like "Project Hail Mary" by Andy Weir about outer space, science fiction, and wondering about the great beyond. MJ got me a free book from the local library here that's doing a Summer Reading Program (an excellent program for kids but even for adults! Adults should read more too during the summer, we just get swept up in going places and summer concerts and being outside that we forget the joy of long days reading outdoors as well).... we each got a free book out of a selection of contemporary popular books and our selections reflected our preferences: she took "Braiding Sweetgrass" about indigenous knowledge and alternative theories to traditional Western scientific technologies, while I chose the fictional book but outer-space related "Project Hail Mary" that I'd heard about for a few years now but never attempted to read based on focusing on actual factual books for trivia study (but you can learn trivia through fiction too!) I loved the Martian, though, and it's one of the last great experiences I've had at a movie theater: totally engrossed in the movie, was engaged from start to finish, and was one of the first movies MJ and I watched together (maybe second after The Good Dinosaur). I would not want to be trapped alone in space, but Andy Weir really likes telling stories about people who do first in the Martian and now in this book, and he probably tapped into something readers didn't know they wanted: the journey of a lifetime, alone, but in extreme circumstances, and using science and know-how to survive. It's like 127 hours or Castaway but in outer space, or a more science-heavy and (maybe more accurate?) version of "Gravity" the Sandra Bullock movie.

Muskrat Love (麝香鼠, マスクラット, 사향쥐)

There are too many types of rodents that feature on Jeopardy. Beyond just the generic types of rodents that everyone is familiar with like rats, mice, squirrels, etc., they get specific about "the largest rodent" (capybara), beavers, rodents named "swamp beavers" that are not actually beavers but are nutria (MJ is grossed out especially by this type) but then also porcupines and hedgehods (you have to know the difference between them!- hedgehogs are much smaller than porcupines), and gophers, prairie dogs, chinchillas, civets, cavies, and so many more. Confused yet? I never had a hamster or gerbil as a pet, never had a classroom that just had a gerbil tank for all the students to see, I never saw the appeal of a rodent for a pet. This weekend though on a visit to a law school friend in Denver, Colorado, I saw lots of wildlife, and a rodent floating in Lake Evergreen and I thought: wow that must be a nutria! I will make my trivia knowledge useful and try to identify this rodent to impress all present company with my knowledge of rodents!!! Nope, as soon as I started thinking about it, someone else opened up google and identified the varmint as a "muskrat," a semiaquatic rodent that lives mostly in North America. And as soon as we had identified this rodent, it swam through the lake underneath the bank, and out of sight. It must have established a home somewhere underneath the main embankment out of sight of humans, or else it may have been exterminated already. Smarter than some humans maybe. "Muskrat Love" is also a popular song by Captain and Tennile about 2 muskrats falling in love, 1976 song. That's all I know about muskrats. Lest you think that a muskrat sighting was my only memorable memory of a Denver getaway, it was a wonderful end-of-May weekend with Red Rocks booming, downtown lit up with summer festivals, and the snowy mountains still beaming brightly in the background wherever you happened to be. If only Denver existed anywhere within 1000 miles of the next major city, I'd consider living there. MJ looked it up, they have a Hmart! Lots of different ethnicities congregating there, real estate market is rising but not terribly so, SoCal folks reportedly flock to the ski cities and try to rent homes within range of the slopes every winter, it has actual snow, the roads are not heavily congested, air is fresh and smog-free, there's an art museum that looks modern and stylistic, what more can you hope for? Indeed, as I walked around downtown, someone remarked that downtown Denver is a lot like downtown Washington D.C., just without the serious political figures possibly walking around. The roads.....can get windy, which is a problem for someone like me who threw up my first time driving through Big Sur on the PCH (Pacific Coast Highway) because of all the twists and turns. Every Day is a Winding Road (Sheryl Crow song) literally for people who live near the mountain suburbs of Denver. Huge college presence too, from University of Denver to Colorado State (Fort Collins) to University of Colorado (Boulder) to Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, to this little-known engineering university I just stumbled upon when meeting my friends in Golden, CO called Colorado School of Mines- they are not literally studying mines, but it's internationally known for its science programs, but I guess not by me. The muskrat sighting was at Lake Evergreen, which is also inhabited by nearby elk which were calving when we were there, which means they're very hostile as they're about to give birth. (Perhaps similar to some human mothers before giving birth?) We saw a wedding conducted at a lake house, there was a waterfall created by a dam, and a nearby golf course. Oh and ice cream shops located conveniently at the end of the a walk around the lake....I swear ice cream shops stay open for business just to lure parents and their kids to reward them for "being good." Remind me never to let my kid (if any) experience ice cream and open Pandora's Box. My friend also is the proud owner of 3 cats, 2 of whom are like family members I reconnected with this weekend because they're 12 and 14 years old, respectively. I've met them at least 4 or 5 times, and each time they greet me warmly. Maybe the golden ratio for starting families is not 2.5 kids and 2 dogs, but 1 kid and 3 cats? The cats never age, at least from their facial features, and they always have energy to at least jump up on a table or ask for neckrubs and purring, even though the oldest one is probably around 80 years in human years, which is an age I really cannot fathom. Then again, when I was 20 I thought 40 was an impossibly old age, and now that I'm approaching that mark it's just warp speed to 80 now, I guess. I've never seen the need for muskrats or rodents as a pet, but cats, at least well behaved ones that don't smell too bad or urinate everywhere they please, would be a welcome addition to our household, MJ and I have just never committed to one, despite always noticing cats lounging on the windowsill in other people's apartment. They all seem cute until you have to be with them day in and day out (and pay for vet fees, traveling with them, etc.) Cat Love!

Boardwalk ( 木板路, 遊歩道, 산책로)

All boardwalks are on a beach, but not all beaches have boardwalks. This Memorial Day weekend, MJ and I had the pleasure of walking on one of the prominent boardwalks in America, and it wasn't the most pleasurable. As expected, everything on the boardwalk was marked up, especially hotel prices (we luckily enjoy traveling vast distances by car and thus avoided being milked for multiple hundreds of dollars per night to sleep in a "crappy" Fairmount Hotel or Holiday Inn Express- MJ's standards are understandably high), with half of that charge not for the hotel but for the proximity of the hotel to the boardwalk. Ben & Jerry's was $8.50 for a "large" cup that wasn't that big (but the small cup was "just $7.50 so psychologically it made you feel like you got a deal?- that's how they get you) and the surchage to get on the "jetty" or "pier" stretching into the ocean was.... get this, $4.00 a person for "watching" the fishermen do their thing. It's a racket. The one pleasurable thing that I got out of it, though, other than the weather and calm May winds that made the weekend just a beautiful one foretelling hopefully a temperate and not sizzling summer, was the boardwalk full of U.S. war facts contributed by the local high schools' AP US History Programs, commemorating the service of military personnel for Memorial Day weekend. About every 100 feet there was a long 7 foot panel called "heroes' Walk displaying information about famous wars or individual battles in US history, everything from must-know wars like the War of 1812 to the much more obscure "Battle of Bladensberg (fought in Maryland in 1814 that allowed the British to arrive in DC and burn everything) to the unknonwable "Easter Offensive" of the Vietnam War. A worthy cause for celebration, these panels full of great history, too bad most boardwalk attendees just chose to walk past them blissfully, not paying attention to any of the contents staring them rigth in the face, usually wih head buried in thir mobile phones and oblivious to the ironically similarly shaped wall panel in front of them. I notice the same thing at art museums: there's a lot less interest in great art museum exhibits than there should be, particularly when there are various ways to get into museums for FREE while baseball games (the Amercian pasttime) charges an entry fee AND exhorbitantly charges its loyal fans whom they supposedly care so much about ("Fan Appreciation Night") $8.50 for a hot dog and $15.00 for a chicken tender + fries meal and alcohol for an absurdly higher upcharge. It's almost like at a baseball game you're paying the baseball franchise to subject you to infomercials and being exploited as a consumer, (you get less stuff for higher cost) while at a museum you get higher quality material (Frida Kahlo displays, history of Barbie dolls, famous Impressionist pieces) for often zero cost. Zero obligation to buy, no need to stay 3 hours at a museum and get trapped into having to pay for a meal. It's a racket. But yea, I like the history of warfare, liking the cool sound of wars and the names of generals who get credit for being on the winning side or the losing side, forgetting that for each battle there are at least hundreds who died probably unnecessarily, and if it's one of the more recent wars, thousands to even hundreds of thousands per war, soldiers who didn't make it to a lofty rank like Lieutenant Colonel or General of the Allied Forces who died without seeing their families for the last time, or died horribly in fire, drowned, or worse, tortured by the enemies before succumbing to their deaths. One of the panels wrote about the Tokyo Raids by U.S. Air Force pilot Jimmy Doolittle, who I had heard about from Jeopardy as doing the heroic feat of slipping past the Japanese ranks and dropping bombs on Tokyo. The Boardwalk panel stated it had the positive effect of raising the morale of US troops after Pearl Harbor had been bombed by the Japanese last year, glossing over some unnecessary details and collateral damage, but reading more carefully it said that a bunch of the planes that flew out with Doolittle got shot down and either fell into Russia or fell into Japanese-occupied China, where they were captured by Japanese and tortured, while some died instantly upon impact. Only Doolittle got the credit by coming out alive as the hero, but how many had to suffer for that one hero to emerge and some "much-needed morale to boost the forces?" Is that really worth all those lives? I certainly wouldn't want to be one of those who died and just became a statistic. O yea, they forgot about the little statistic (credit to the Boardwalk panel to include this) that 250,000 Chinese people were killed by Japanese troops for trying to help the U.S. fighters who crash landed in Japanese-occupied China. I had to do a double take on seeing that number. I know that the West doesn't value Chinese lives and thinks China has a billion people anyway, who cares, but half a million people died as a result of Jimmy freakin' Doolittle? (O and let's not forget the bombing of Tokyo probably took out innocent civilians' lives, not likely the emperor or any higher-ups in the military who actually were responsible for WWII and Pearl Harbor). I appreciate the dedication to the U.S. troops on Memorial Day, but could we also take the chance to acknowledge that some of these battles were mostly costly and might not have been the best idea just assessing the cost-benefit analysis afterwards?